HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4280 of 2026 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Sri Himanshu Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner has made a statement at bar that the writ petitioner has rendered infructuous particularly when the application under Order 9 Rule 9 CPC has been decided, thus, now liberty be accorded to take appropriate legal proceedings as permissible under law. 2. Sri Rama Goel Bansal who appears for the respondents has no objection to the same. 3. Accordingly, the present application is dismissed as infructuous with the aforesaid liberty. May 18, 2026 Rajesh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Birendra Kumar, Himanshu Dubey, Sr. Advocate Counsel for Respondent(s) : Ghazanfar Abbas, Mohan Lal Pandey, Rama Goel Bansal, Shalini Goel (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Indrapal .....Petitioner(s) Neeraj Goyal And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad