Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11478 WP No. 37510 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 37510 OF 2025 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN: SRI.NAGARAJA S/O LATE KRISHNEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/A KALLARE KOPPALU VILLAGE, KATTAYA HOBLI, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 128. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.BASANAGOUDA S.S., ADVOCATE FOR SRI.VIRUPAKSHAIAH P.H., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN 573 201. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11478 WP No. 37510 of 2025
3.
THE TAHSILDHAR HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN 573 201.
4.
THE LAND GRANT COMMITTEE FOR GRANT OF LANDS TO UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS OF GOVERNMENT LANDS, HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN 573 201.
BY ITS CHAIRMAN. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SESHU V., HCGP)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO CONSIDER AND DISPOSE OF THE APPLICATION DATED 25.09.1991 VIDE ANNEXURE-A FILED BY THE PETITIONER FOR REGULARIZATION OF THE UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION OF THE LAND BEARING SY.NO.121 MEASURING TO AN EXTENT OF 1 ACRE 20 GUNTAS SITUATED AT KATTAYA VILLAGE, HASSAN TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT EXPEDITIOUSLY AND ETC.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11478 WP No. 37510 of 2025
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER The grievance of the petitioner is that his application filed in Form No.53 seeking regularization of unauthorised occupation of land in Sy.No.121 of Kattaya Village, Hassan Taluk and Hassan District to an extent of 1 acre 20 guntas has not been considered till date. Therefore, the prayer in the petition is to direct the respondent to consider the application at Annexure-A dated 25.09.1991 and till consideration, direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petition schedule properties.
2. Having regard to the contentions raised in the writ petition and submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that respondent No.3-Tahsildar was duty bound to place the application filed by the petitioner before the ‘Committee for Regularization of Unauthorized Occupation’ and the Committee was also duty bound to consider the application and pass necessary orders.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:11478 WP No. 37510 of 2025
3. The writ petition stands disposed of with a specific direction to respondent No.3-Tahsildar, Hassan Taluk, to verify from the records as to whether such application filed by the petitioner at Annexure-A dated 25.09.1991 is pending
consideration. If it is found that such application was indeed filed by the petitioner and the application is yet to be considered, the Tahsildar is directed to place before the Committee for regularisation of unauthorised occupation, the applications along with his recommendation within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Thereafter, the Committee shall consider the application and pass necessary orders in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and at any rate within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 33