Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17557 (BOM)

MANOJ VISHWAMBAR WATTAMWAR v. SHARADKUMAR SUNDARDAS WATTAMWAR

CA/8611/2019 · 2026-10-09

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) 953 ca 8611.19 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 953 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8611 OF 2019 IN SA/106/2019 MANOJ VISHWAMBAR WATTAMWAR VERSUS SHARADKUMAR SUNDARDAS WATTAMWAR ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Kadam Vishant P. Advocate for Respondents : Mr. A.S. Kale ….. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 09.10.2026 P.C.:- 1. This application is filed for condonation of delay of 11 days in filing the application for restoration of second appeal. 2. Heard the learned advocate for the applicant. It is pointed out that inadvertently office objections were not removed and the second appeal came to be dismissed 3. Perused the application. Heard the learned advocate for applicant. 4. For the reasons stated in the application and subject to removal of office objections within three weeks, the delay of 11 days in filing the 2026:BHC-AUG:48150 ( 2 ) 953 ca 8611.19 application for restoration of appeal is condoned, and the second appeal is restored to its original position. The Civil Application stands allowed in the interest of justice. 5. If the office objections are not removed within three weeks, the application shall stand rejected. [SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.] mubashir