APHC010089632013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13203/2013 Between: 1. S.NAGA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, S/O LATE GANGARAM SASTRY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, WORKING AS JUNIOR ASSISTANT IN ORIENTAL.HIGH SCHOOL OF SRI VV SATYANARYANA SWAMY DEVASTHANAM, ANNAVARAM, R/O.ANNAVARAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA SWAMY VARI DEVASTHANAM, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ANNAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER ENDOWMENTS GOVERNMENT OF A P, TILAK ROAD, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondent in treating the employees belonging to the unit of the office of Devasthanam, Junior college, and the Oriental High School as district and Separate units of appointment as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the orders of this Hon'ble High Court passed in W.P. No. 10896/87, dated 26-4-1988, and direct the 1st respondent to treat all the employees working in all the three units as belonging to one unit only and on that basis to determine the interse Seniority and consider the 2 petitioner's candidature for promotion to the cadre of Senior Assistant and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 16218 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to consider my promotion to the post of Senior Assistant in arising vacancy, in the 1st respondent Devasthanam by in accordance with my seniority and eligibility by duly considering my representation dated 25-01-2013 and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interest of Justice. pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMALINGESWARA RAO KOCHARLA KOTA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V T M PRASAD SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS 2. V T M PRASAD 3. KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERA SC For Endowments 4. ELEVATED AS JUDGE The Court made the following: 3 Order:- No representation for the petitioner. 2. The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that in pursuance of the interim orders dated 29.04.2013, the grievance of the petitioner has been adequately addressed by the respondents. It is also stated that the petitioner was directed to report for duty as Superintendent In-charge. 3. Recording the same, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 11.03.2026 PNS