Narinder Singh v. Kawal Singh Cr.MP(M) No.749 of 2026 27.07.2026 Present: Mr. Ashok Kumar Verma, Advocate, for the petitioner. Cr.MP(M) No.749 of 2026 For the reasons stated in the application, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor willful, rather same has occurred on account of circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant, as such, delay, if any in filing the petition is condoned. The application is disposed of. Cr.R. No. of 2026 (Cr.RST/2809/26) & CrMPST/2811/26. Be registered. Learned counsel representing petitioner states that parties have agreed to settle their dispute amicably interse them, whereby entire amount of compensation has been paid to the respondent, as such, this Court, while exercising power under Section 147 of Negotiable Instruments Act, may proceed to compound the offence. Though factum of compromise stands duly established by placing on record compromise deed, but before considering the prayer of the petitioner, this Court finds it necessary to cause presence of the respondent. In view of the above, list this case on 17.8.2026, on which date, both petitioner and respondent shall remain present. Learned counsel representing petitioner undertakes to cause presence of respondent on the next date of hearing. Since parties have already settled their dispute amicably, this Court orders that till the next date of hearing, no coercive steps shall be taken against petitioner/accused in terms of judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 18/19.3.2025 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Una, District Una, Himachal Pradesh. CrMP No. of 2026 (CRMPST/2813/26) The application is disposed of with direction to the applicant to file certified copy of the judgment in question within afore period. July 27, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), manjit Judge