[2026:RJ-JP:4825] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 8835/2011 Smt. Kokila Bai wife of Mohanlal aged about 31 years, R/o Khatoli, Tehsil Pipalda, District Kota, presently working at Samaj Kalyan Kanya Chhatravas, Khatoli, District Kota ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Secretary, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur. 2. Director, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Deputy Director, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment Kota. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.C. Sharma, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manish Bhardwaj, Adv. for Mr. Amitosh Pareek, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 02/02/2026 1. The instant petition has been preferred by the petitioner with the following prayers:- "1. यह कक अपाररयों को कनररश फरमाये जावे कक वे पाररया को माननीय नायालय दारा पाररत कनररय की अनुसरर मे कनयुकक कतकर से 2 वरर पूरर होने के पशात से चतुरर शेरी कमरचारी की नूनतम वेतन शृंखला का लाभ व एररयर मय 12 पकतशत बाज सकहत करलाया जावे। 2. यह कक अपारर संखा-3 दारा जारी आरेश NIL परशर-1 को अपास फरमाया जावे एवं अपाररगरों को कनररश फरमाये जावे कक पाररया को पूवर की भांकत उनके वतरमान परसाकपत सान पर यरावत रखे एवं उने राजकीय मर से वेतन का भुगतान करे। 3. यह कक अपाररगर को कनररश फरमाया जावे कक वे पाररगर की लमी सेवाओं को रेखते हए उने ककसी [2026:RJ-JP:4825] (2 of 3) [CW-8835/2011] पेसमेट एजेनी के अधीन कनयुक नहीं कर उनकी सेवाये कनयकमत की जावे। 4. यह कक अन कोई राररशी जो माननीय नाायलय जो पारीया के हक मे उकचत समझे परान की जावे । 5. यह कक याकचका का हजार खचार अपाररगर से करलवाये जाने का आरेश फरमाये ।" 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that in the light of the judgment passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18945/2025 titled as Nathi Devi vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr., dated 05.12.2025, the petitioner may be granted liberty to submit her representation before the respondents authority. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner also referred to the judgment passed in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.8292/2002 titled as Nawal Kishore Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors., decided on 29.08.2025 by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court and upon the judgment passed by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Dharam Singh Vs. State of U.P. and Anr., in Civil Appeal No.8558/2018 dated 19.08.2025. 4. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it proper to direct the respondents authority to decide the representation submitted by the petitioner within a period of 30 days. The authorities are directed to decide the representation of the petitioner in the light of the ratio laid down in the case of Dharam Singh (Supra) followed by the Court in the case of Nawal Kishore (Supra). The respondents are under an obligations to communicate the decision made by them to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through email, if same has been provided by the petitioner. [2026:RJ-JP:4825] (3 of 3) [CW-8835/2011] 5. If the petitioner still feels aggrieved by the decision, she will be at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 6. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioner, then the same benefits be extended. 7. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition alongwith pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-80