Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17549 (CHH)

JANMEJAY RATHORE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/12779/2025 · 2026-02-27

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:10542 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12779 of 2025 • Janmejay Rathore S/o Dukhharan Lal Rathore Aged About 38 Years Presently Working As Head Master (Primary School) At Govt. Boys Primary School, Nariyara, Block Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2. Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 3. Divisional Joint Director Education Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4. Collector District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh 5. District Education Officer Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh 6. Block Education Officer Akaltara, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Govind Prasad Dewangan, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Vivek Verma, Govt. Advocate and Ms. Anuja Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 28/02/2026 1. Petitioner who is holding post of Head Master has filed this writ petition challenging the impugned order of transfer dated 04.06.2025, under the rationalization policy, whereby petitioner has been transferred from Govt. Boys Primary School, Nariyara to Govt. Primary School, Budibhatha, Baghouda. PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA Date: 2026.02.28 18:28:09 +0530 2 / 2 2. Learned State counsel submits that in the rationalization policy, State Government has constituted three committees ie., district level committee, divisional level committee and the state level committee. Representation submitted by petitioner before the divisional level committee headed by Divisional Commissioner is rejected on 10.09.2025. Petitioner can file appeal/ representation before the State level committee headed by Director, Directorate Public Instruction (DPI). 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in view of submission of learned counsel for respondent-State, petitioner may be granted liberty to file appeal/ representation before the State level committee headed by DPI and direction be issued to the state level committee to consider and take decision on the representation at the earliest within specified time. 4. On due consideration of the submission of learned counsel for the respective parties, this writ petition is disposed of reserving liberty with the petitioner to submit representation before the State level committee headed by DPI and if such representation is submitted the concerned committee shall consider and take decision on the representation/ appeal of petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of 04 weeks from the date of receipt of representation/ appeal. 5. With the aforesaid observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE