301-FA-1995-16 (+2).odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 301 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1995 OF 2016 The State Of Maharashtra VERSUS Nana Vitthal Chede (Died) Through L.Rs. Balu And Ors …… Mr. D.R. Korde, AGP for Appellant-State …… 302 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1996 OF 2016 The State Of Maharashtra VERSUS Yashwant Satu Chede And Others …… Mr. A.D. Wange, AGP for Appellant-State …… 303 FIRST APPEAL NO. 1997 OF 2016 The State Of Maharashtra VERSUS Bhau Laxman Magar And Ors …… Mr. B.A. Shinde, AGP for Appellant-State …… CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 06 OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned AGPs for the Appellant-State 2. By these Appeals, the appellant-State takes exception to the common impugned Judgment and Award dated 02.08.2011 passed by the learned 2nd 2026:BHC-AUG:47248 301-FA-1995-16 (+2).odt 2 Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ahmednagar, in Land Acquisition Reference Nos 155 of 1993, 158 of 1993, 156 of 1993. 3. Learned AGPs appeared in the respective matters submit that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer. 4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No. Sankirna-2014 / Prak.Kra.4 / Bham-1 /A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned order. Hence, the present Appeals are dismissed. 6. The Claimant is at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any. 7. In view of dismissal of the Appeals, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. [ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE S P Rane