[2026:RJ-JP:3562-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6180/2024 1. Shreekesh S/o Hari Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Bagathar, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur. 2. Shatrughan S/o Bharat Singh, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Village Bagathar, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur. 3. Mukesh S/o Gyasi, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Village Bagathar, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur. 4. Prahlad S/o Bindavan, Aged About 72 Years, R/o Village Bagathar, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur. 5. Seetaram S/o Edal, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Bagathar, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur. 6. Shri Ram S/o Mukhiya, Aged About 73 Years, R/o Village Bagathar, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Principle Secretary, Panchayati Raj Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 3. Additional Commissioner And Joint Secretary Inquiry, Panchayati Raj Department, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 4. Zila Parishad, Dholpur, Through Chief Executive Officer, At District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 5. Panchayat Samiti, Baseri, Through Secretary, At Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 6. Gram Panchayat, Bagthar, Through Secretary At Village Bagthar, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 7. Lakhan Singh S/o Hakim Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Village Bagthar, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur, Rajasthan. 8. Ritesh Bansal S/o Mohan Bansal, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Tiwari Thok Colony, Baseri, Tehsil Baseri, District Dholpur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sachin Kumar. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ashutosh Udawat with Ms. Divya Rathore, Ms. Anshul Ranga and Ms. Anjali Ranga for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur, AAG. Mr. Ashish Aggarwal. Mr. Anil Kumar Garg. [2026:RJ-JP:3562-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-6180/2024] HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA O R D E R 27/01/2026 1. This writ petition (PIL) has been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Chapter XXII-A Rule 385-A to 385-R of the Rajasthan High Court Rules claiming the following reliefs: "i) Respondents No.1 to 6 may kindly be directed to complete the inquiry within one month, against the respondent No. 7 and 8, with recording the videos and capturing the photos of the actual site, which are mentioned in the Paras No. 4.4, 4.5 and 4.6 of this writ petition, and; ii) Respondents No. 1 to 6 may also be directed to submit the inquiry report before this Hon'ble Court and if the respondents No. 7 and 8 found guilty in the inquiry report than the embezzled money may kindly be ordered to recover from them and the respondents No. 7 and 8 may be suspended from their respective posts and the departmental disciplinary inquiry may also be conducted against them and the FIR may also be lodged against them, and; iii) Any other order or directions which this Hon'ble court deems fit and proper may kindly be passed in the favour of the petitioner." 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks to withdraw this writ petition without prejudiced to their rights to follow the issue, which they have raised before the Anti Corruption Bureau. 3. Prayer sought for is granted. 4. Consequently, the present writ petition (PIL) is dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J (DR.PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI),J Zeeshan 149