Hem Shankar Sharma v. Bhupinder Jit Kashyap Cr.MP(M) No.1126 of 2026 27.07.2026 Present: Ms. Pooja Thakur, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Harish Kashyap, Advocate, for the non- applicant/respondent. CrMP(M) No.1126 of 2026 By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prayer has been made by the applicant/petitioner for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying petition, which is barred by limitation. Mr. Harish Kashyap, Advocate, while appearing on behalf of the non-applicant/respondent, state that he does not intend to file reply to the application and this court may pass appropriate orders. Having carefully perused averments contained in the application, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor willful, rather same has occurred on account of circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant, as such, delay, which has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application is disposed of. Cr.Revision No. of 2026 Be registered. Notice. Mr. Harish Kashyap, Advocate, waives notice on behalf of the respondent. Record be called for. Cr.MP No. of 2026 (CrMPST/5212/2026) Notice in the aforesaid terms. Reply, if any, on or before the next date of hearing. In the meantime, substantive sentence imposed by the learned trial court shall remain suspended, subject to applicant’s depositing 50% of the compensation amount, which shall also include the amount already deposited and furnishing personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (rupees twenty five thousand only) with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court within six weeks. July 27, 2026 (Sandeep Sharma), manjit Judge