Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17534 (JHR)

SHEKH MOSIN ALIAS MD. BADSHAH@ MD BADSHA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3215/2026 · 2026-06-22

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18123 --1-- A.B.A. No. 3215 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3215 of 2026 ---- Shekh Mosin @ Md. Badshah @ Md. Badsha, aged about 30 years, son of Md. Hatim resident of village – Amjhar, PO and PS – Baliapur, District – Dhanbad, Jharkhand .... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Zaid Imam, Advocate :- Mr. Biplav Bhaiya, Advocate :- Mr. Saddam Ansari, Advocate For the State :- Mr. Gautam Rakesh, Advocate For the Informant :- Mr. M.B. Lal, Advocate :- Mr. Avilash Kumar, Advocate ---- 02/22.06.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel appearing for the Informant. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Baliapur P.S. Case No.61 of 2026, for the alleged offences registered under Sections 80(2) and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a cousin brother of the husband of the deceased and the petitioner is residing separately and all the family members have been made accused. He further submits that she has committed suicide and that has come in the postmortem report that it has occurred due to asphyxia due to hanging. He then submits that husband of the deceased 2026:JHHC:18123 --2-- A.B.A. No. 3215 of 2026 is already in custody. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State and Informant jointly opposed the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of torture and assault and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that the petitioner happened to be the cousin brother of husband of the deceased and husband of the deceased is already in custody and in the FIR the allegations are there against the husband of the deceased of demand of dowry and car and the death is said to be due to asphyxia due to hanging. In the attending facts and circumstances of this case, I am inclined to provide anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is hereby directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today, and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the petitioner, above named, shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Baliapur P.S. Case No.61 of 2026, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 22.06.2026 Sangam/