16.COMIP-120.26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 120 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (L) NO.6611 OF 2026 WITH LEAVE PETITION NO.87 OF 2026 IN COMMERCIAL IP SUIT NO. 120 OF 2026 Metro Brands Limited … Plaintiff V/s. Metro Footwear & Ors. ….Defendants ______________________ Ms. Gauri Sansare and Ms. Varsha Vasave i/by Mr. Avesh Kayser, for the Plaintiff. Ms. Archishmati Chandramore for the Defendant Nos.1 and 3. Mrs. S. S. Chipkar, Master (Adm.) Court Receiver present. ______________________ CORAM : MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 8 OCTOBER 2026 P. C. :- 1. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff and learned counsel appearing for the Defendant Nos.1 and 3. Leave Petition No. 87 OF 2026 2. Perused the averments in the Plaint and Leave Petition. Page 1 PPN PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Digitally signed by PRACHI PRANESH NANDIWADEKAR Date: 2026.10.09 11:42:29 +0530 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC 3. For the reasons set out in Leave Petition No. 87 of 2026, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b). Commercial IP Suit No. 120 OF 2026 4. Learned counsel appearing for the Plaintiff and learned counsel for the Defendant Nos.1 and 3 state that the parties have settled the dispute and tendered the ‘Consent Terms’. 5. Both the learned counsel state that Defendant No.2 has passed away and therefore, suit be disposed of against Defendant No.2 as infracturious. 6. The consent terms are signed on behalf of the Plaintiff by Ms. Deepa Sood, Vice President (Legal) of Plaintiff-Company, who has been authorised to sign the consent terms by Board Resolution passed by the Board of Directors in meeting dated 20 May 2026. The Board Resolution is annexed at page 15 of the consent terms. The consent terms are also signed by Defendant No.3- Ms.Neha Rastogi, who is the proprietor of Defendant No.1-Metro Footwear. 7. Ms. Deepa Sood, authorised representative of Plaintiff and Ms. Neha Rastogi-Defendant No.3 and the proprietor of Defendant No.1 are present through Video Conferencing and state that parties Page 2 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC have settled the dispute in terms of the consent terms. 8. Accordingly, the Consent Terms are taken on record and marked as “X” for identification. A scanned copy of the Consent Terms is reproduced herein below: Page 3 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC Page 4 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC Page 5 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC Page 6 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC Page 7 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC Page 8 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC Page 9 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC Page 10 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC Page 11 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC Page 12 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC Page 13 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC 9. Various statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings given to the Court. 10. Accordingly, Commercial Intellectual Property Rights Suit (L) No.120 of 2026 is decreed as against Defendant Nos.1 and 3 in terms of the Consent Terms. As the Defendant No.2 has passed away, the suit is disposed of as infracturious as against Defendant No.2. Page 14 PPN 16.COMIP-120.26.DOC 11. Refund of Court fees as per rules. 12. In view of disposal of Commercial Intellectual Property Rights Suit (L) No.120 of 2026, nothing survives in Interim Application (L) No.6611 of 2026 and the same is also disposed of in terms of consent terms. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.] Page 15 PPN