RAMESH KUMAR SAINI, S/O SHRI RAMSAHAI SAINI v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/4911/2025 · 2026-02-05
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17530 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17530 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:5506] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4911/2025 Ramesh Kumar Saini, S/o Shri Ramsahai Saini, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Chandoliyon Ki Dhani, Reengus Road, Kasba Chomu, Tehsil Chomu, District-Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary, Home Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Administrative Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate Jaipur, Government Hostel, Jaipur (Raj). 3. Deputy Commissioner Of Police (Jaipur West), Police Commissionerate Jaipur, Jaipur (Raj). 4. Assistant Commissioner Of Police, Circle Chomu, Jaipur West. 5. Station House Officer, Police Station, Chomu, District- Jaipur West, (Raj.)
6. Project Director, Nhai Piu-Jaipur, Having Its Office At D- 148, Behind Rseb Sub-Station, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur
302021. 7. Deputy General Manager, Jaipur Retail Region, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Having Its Regional Office At Tel Bhawan, Sahkar Marg, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur -3020005. 8. Narayan S/o Shri Rugharam Mali, Aged About 85 Years, R/o Village Hodota, Tehsil Chomu, District-Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Udit Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jai Prakash Gupta Mr. Himanshu Danodia for Adv. Poonam Bawalia Ms. Suman Shekhawat, Mr. Shami Khan and Mr. Parth Sharma for Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG Mr. Dhruv Tailor Mr. Ajay Kumar Tanenia Ms. Kavita Sharma Mr. Sunil Dutt Upple
[2026:RJ-JP:5506] (2 of 4) [CW-4911/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 05/02/2026
1. The instant writ petition has been file filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:-
“a. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction, therein directing the Respondent No. 7 to refrain from withdrawing the Letter of Intent dated 07.09.2021 issued in favour of the Petitioner, in the facts and circumstances of the present and respondent No. 7 may further be restrained from forfeiting any of the amount deposited by the Petitioner pursuant to Letter of Intent dated
07.09.2021. b. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction, therein directing the Respondent No. 6 to refrain from cancelling the provisional NOC granted vide letter dated 03.05.2023 as per para (y) of the said letter. c. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction, therein directing the Respondent Police to provide adequate security to the Petitioner for undertaking due development of site as per the terms of conditions of the LOI dated 07.09.2021 issued by HPCL.
d. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction, therein directing the Respondent No. 8 not to create obstruction or impediment in execution of work by the Petitioner or by the officer of HPCL for development of retail petrol outlet. e. Any other order or direction which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the Petitioners. f. Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioner.”
2. The learned counsel for the respondent HPCL states that the respondent has already issued the LOI in favour of the
[2026:RJ-JP:5506] (3 of 4) [CW-4911/2025] petitioner and it has no objection if the petitioner raises retail petrol outlet, as per the LOI, on the proposed land. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the LOI has been issued in favour of the petitioner and the respondent HPCL though has no objection, but the respondent No.8 is creating hurdle in establishing the retail petrol outlet and, therefore, the respondent corporation has sent a notice dated 17.03.2025 to the S.H.O., Police Station Chomu, Jaipur West, District Jaipur, for providing Police assistance to the LOI holder and to take action against the respondent No.8. 4. Considered the submissions made at bar and also perused the material made available on record. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems just and proper to dispose the instant writ petition with the following observation:- (I)The petitioner is free to establish the retail petrol outlet for which LOI has been issued in his favour by the respondent HPCL on the proposed land. (II) As regards the prayer for police assistance is concerned, the petitioner shall file a fresh representation along with photocopies of earlier correspondence/notice and certified copy of this order before the Commissioner of Police, Police Commissionarate, Jaipur, within a period of seven days from today.
(II) In case, any such representation is submitted by the petitioner, the Commissioner
[2026:RJ-JP:5506] (4 of 4) [CW-4911/2025] of Police shall take necessary steps to provide requisite police to the petitioner, of course after taking requisite charges. (IV) Needful be done within two weeks from the date of receipt of the representation. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is disposed of. 7. The stay application and pending application, if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /76