Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17529 (JHR)

DILIP YADAV ALIAS DILIP KUMAR YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3195/2026 · 2026-06-22

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18082 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3195 of 2026 ------ Dilip Yadav @ Dilip Kumar Yadav, aged about 47 years, son of Late Gabi Yadav, resident of Village Purani Sahibganj, P.O. and P.S. Borio (J), District Sahibganj, Jharkhand .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner : Ms. Saba Ali, Advocate For the State : Mr. Satish Kumar Keshri, A.P.P. ------ 02/22.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Borio P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 303(2), 118(2), 308(3), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sahibganj. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and the petitioner happens to be the Raiyat of the land in question. She next submits that the petitioner is an ex-MLA whose house is there behind the land of this petitioner and he is trying to grab the land. She further submits that there are case and counter case for the land dispute. She also submits that the said Dhruv Bhagat, who is the informant, has also lodged two other cases against the petitioner for the same dispute. On these grounds, she submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be granted. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are of demolishing of the boundary wall and demanding ransom and in view of that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that there is land dispute and for that there are case and counter case and the informant has also lodged two other cases against the petitioner for the same dispute and it has been pointed out that to grab the land of this petitioner, the informant has lodged false case as he 2026:JHHC:18082 is a powerful man, in the attending facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Sahibganj, in connection with Borio P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 23.06.2026