Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Karan Sharma v. State of Himachal Pradesh Cr.MP(M) No.1365 of 2026 27.07.2026 Present: Ms. Pooja Thakur, for the applicant/petitioner.
Mr. Rajan Kahol & Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan & Mr. Anish Banshtu, Deputy Advocates General, for the respondent/State.
CrMP No. 3072 of 2026
For the reasons stated in the application, same is allowed and delay, if any, in refiling the petition after removal of objections, is condoned. The application is disposed of.
CrMP(M) No.1365 of 2026
By way of instant application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, prayer has been made by the applicant/petitioner for condonation of delay in maintaining the accompanying petition, which is barred by limitation.
Despite notice, no reply has been filed by the non- applicant/respondent.
Having carefully perused averments contained in the application, this Court is convinced and satisfied that delay in maintaining the accompanying petition is neither intentional nor willful, rather same has occurred on account of circumstances, which were completely beyond the control of the applicant, as such, delay, which has been sufficiently explained, is condoned. The application is disposed of.
Cr.Revision No. of 2026 & CrMPST/3102/26
Be registered.
Notice. Mr. Rajan Kahol, learned Additional Advocate General, waives notice on behalf of the respondent/State. He prays for and is granted ten days’ time to file reply.
List on 10.8.2026.
July 27, 2026
(Sandeep Sharma),
manjit
Judge