THE STATE OF MAHARSHTRA AND ANR v. SHESHERAO SHRAVAN PAWAR AND ANR
FA/721/2012 · 2026-10-06
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17521 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17521 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
309-FA-721-2012.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 309 FIRST APPEAL NO. 721 OF 2012 The State Of Maharshtra And Another VERSUS Shesherao Shravan Pawar And Another …… Mr. B.A. Shinde, AGP for Appellant-State ……
CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 06 OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT :
1. Heard the learned counsel for the Appellant/State.
2. By this appeal, the Appellant-State assail the common impugned
Judgment and award dated 16.04.2010 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Osmanabad, in L.A.R. No. 565 of 2009 (Old LAR No.82 of 2007).
3. Learned AGP for the appellant-State submits that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and having regard to the policy decision of the State Government contained in Government Resolution No. Sankirna-2014 / Prak.Kra.4 / Bham-1 /A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 2026:BHC-AUG:47233
309-FA-721-2012.odt 2
5. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned
order. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed.
6. The Claimant is at liberty to withdraw the amount deposited by the State/acquiring body before the learned Reference Court, if any.
7. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly.
[ SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE ] JUDGE S P Rane