DR. SURESH KUMAR JAT S/O SHREE JAGDISH PRSAD JAT v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/3429/2026 · 2026-02-23
Anand Sharma
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1752 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1752 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:8348] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3429/2026
1. Dr. Suresh Kumar Jat S/o Shree Jagdish Prsad Jat, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Dhaani Dera Wali, Kotri Simarla Kotri District Sikar Rajasthan. Presently Working In Under Rajses Government Collage Sri Madhopur.
2. Rajendra Kumar S/o Bajrang Lal, Aged About 36 Years, R/ o Ward No. 12, Parasrampura Jhunjhunun Rajasthan. Presently Working In Under Rajses Government Collage Sri Madhopur.
3. Dr.anita Choudhary D/o Mohan Lal Bajiya, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Village Gomawali Tahsil Srimadhopur Post Sirohi, Sikar Rajasthan. Presently Working In Under Rajses Government Collage Sri Madhopur.
4. Urmila Kumari D/o Kaluram, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Ward No. 2 Dhani Jhajhuda Ratanpura Nathusar Tahsil Srimadhopur Post Nathusar, Sikar Rajasthan. Presently Working In Under Rajses Government Collage Sri Madhopur.
5. Damodar Prsad Yadav S/o Baldevram Yadav, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Dhani Nolsingh Ward No. 3 Antpura, Sikar Rajasthan. Presently Working In Under Rajses Government Collage Sri Madhopur.
6. Dr. Shrawan Kumar Nogia S/o Chandra Ram Nogia, Aged About 49 Years, R/o Ward No. 8 Raigro Ka Mohalla Lisariya, Sikar Rajasthan. Presently Working In Under Rajses Government Collage Sri Madhopur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Commissioner, College Education, Shiksha Sankul, Jln Marg, Jaipur.
3. Principal, Under Rajses Government Collage, Srimadhopur Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Sharma Upadhyay Mr. Mithun Bhai Chaturvedi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Chinmay Saxena, AGC
[2026:RJ-JP:8348] (2 of 2) [CW-3429/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA
Order 23/02/2026
1. Mr. Chinmay Saxena, AGC appears and accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for both the parties are in agreement that the controversy involved in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the judgment of State of Rajasthan & Ors. Vs. Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. in D.B. Special Appeal (Writ) No. 903/2023 decided on 19.09.2025. In the aforesaid judgment following directions were given:
"(1).
The
respondents/original petitioners/applicants are entitled to continue on their respective posts till they are replaced by existing regular employees or regularly selected candidates through RPSC. (2). The respondents/original petitioners/applicants would be continued on their posts provided that sufficient number of students are available for the particular courses(s) for which they were appointed. (3). The respondents/original petitioners/applicants would be entitled to honorarium at the rate of Rs.800/- per hour as is being paid to them presently or to be modified by the State from time to time."
3. In view of the consensus, this writ petition is disposed of and the directions given in the above case of Ram Chaturvedi & Ors. (supra) shall also be applicable in the case of the petitioner.
4. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(ANAND SHARMA),J NEERU /82