Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17519 (JHR)

JAWED ALI ALIAS BABLU ALIAS JAVED ALI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.A(SJ)/32/2026 · 2026-06-22

Rajesh Kumar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18094 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.32 of 2026 .... 1. Jawed Ali @ Bablu @ Javed Ali, aged about 44 Years, S/O Late Haji Shoukat Ali Resident of Village-512 Patel Compound, Main Road, Ranchi, near Hotel Radisson Blue P.O.-G.P.O. P.S.-Hindpiri District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 2. Ekhala Que Ali @ Akhlaque @ Chand, aged about 33 Years S/O Late Haji Shoukat Ali Resident of Village-RC Mission School Ranchi P.O.-G.P.O. P.S.- Hindpiri District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) 3. Haidar Ali @ Pappu @ Hyder Ali, age about 45 Years S/O Late Haji Shoukat Ali Resident of Village-512 Patel Compound, Main Road, Ranchi, near Hotel Radisson Blue P.O.-G.P.O. P.S.-Hindpiri District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) .… Appellants Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Koka Oraon S/O Late Sukara Oraon Resident of Village-Bhatti Chowk P.O. & P.S.- Hindpiri District-Ranchi (Jharkhand) .... Respondents .... CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR For the Appellants : Mr. K.S.Nanda, Adv. For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. For the Resp. No.2 : Mr. Zafar Alam, Adv. .... 10/22.06.2026 1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 2. The present appeal has been filed for setting aside the order dated 11.11.2024 passed in SC/ST Case No.86 of 2024 arising out of Hindpiri P.S. Case No.73 of 2024 passed by learned A.J.C.-II-cum-Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Ranchi, whereby the trial court has been pleased to take cognizance for the offence under Sections 323/ 341/ 504/ 506/ 419/ 420/ 34 of IPC and under Section 3(1) (G) (R) (S) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act against the accused persons. 3. Learned counsel for the appellants seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal with a liberty to work out their remedy in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the respondent No.2 have raised no objection. 5. Permission is accorded. 6. Accordingly, the present criminal appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 7. Pending I.A., if any, also stands disposed of. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 22.06.2026 Shahid/ Uploaded on 23.06.2026