Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17517 (AP)

B.Vijaya Claries Kumari v. The A.P.Social welfare Residential Educational

WP/2003/2014 · 2026-01-26

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010087372014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 2003/2014 Between: 1. B.VIJAYA CLARIES KUMARI, W/ O.CH.VISHNU MURTHY AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, OCC: TGT (COMMERCE) IN APSWRS/JC(G), TUNI EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE A P SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL, INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TELUGU SAMKSHEMA BHAVAN MASAB TANK, HYDERABAD. 2. THE PRINCIPAL, A.P.SOCIAL WELFARE RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL/JUNIOR COLLEGE (G) TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the 1st respondent in issuing order in Proceedings Rc.No.Z-I/ 13790/2004 Dated: 03.12.2013 placing the petitioner under suspension pending enquiry as bad arbitrary, illegal and violation of Principles of Natural Justice IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 2423 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order in Proceedings Rc.No. Z-1/ 13790/2004 2 Dated: 03.12.2013 issued by the 1st respondent, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. C DAMODAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 27.01.2026 PNS