Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17515 (BOM)

AFROZ S/O. AYUB KHAN. v. TANZEELANAZ W/O. AFROZ KHAN.

CA/11660/2026 · 2026-10-08

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

940 ca 11660-26 . IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 940 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11660 OF 2026 IN FCAST/14030/2026 AFROZ S/O. AYUB KHAN. VERSUS TANZEELANAZ W/O. AFROZ KHAN. ... Mr. Shaikh Moinuddin Nasiruddin, Advocate for Applicant …. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE & VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ. Date : 08/10/2026 PER COURT : 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant. 2. The applicant-husband seeks restoration of his First Appeal by setting aside the order dated 14/07/2026, whereby the application for restoration came to be rejected on account of non-removal of the office objections within three weeks. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses ‘B’ and ‘C’, subject to removal of the office objections within a period of three weeks. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. [VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV] [SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] JUDGE JUDGE VS Maind/ Page|1 2026:BHC-AUG:47555-DB