968 CA NO. 8210 OF 2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 968 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 8210 OF 2025 IN SAST/31743/2024 Babu Eknath Chikate, VERSUS Gopal Eknath Chikate And Others ... Mr. G. K. Sontakke, Advocate for Applicant …. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 07.10.2026 PER COURT :- 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 148 days caused in filing the present Civil Application and for setting aside the order dated 22.01.2025 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial) for non-removal of office objections and for restoring Second Appeal (ST) No.31743 of 2024 to its original stage. 2. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicant. He submits that, inadvertently the office objections could not be removed within the stipulated time. Consequently, a conditional order came to be passed for non-removal of the office objections, and registration of the Second Appeal was refused. He further submits that the delay caused in filing the present application is not deliberate and prays that Second Appeal (ST) No.31743 of 2024 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:47553 (( 2 )) 968 CA NO. 8210 OF 2025 be restored to its original stage. 3. Perused the application. Considering the reasons stated therein, it appears that the delay has not been caused deliberately. Therefore, the application deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice. Hence, the following order: ::ORDER:: a. The application is allowed. b. The delay of 148 days caused in filing the Civil Application for restoration of Second Appeal (ST) No.31743 of 2024 to its original stage is condoned. c. Second Appeal (ST) No.31743 of 2024 is restored to its original stage, subject to removal of office objections within two weeks from today. If office objections are not removed within two weeks, the application shall be deemed to be dismissed without further reference to the Court. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 2 of 2