1 2026:CGHC:8975 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 1844 of 2018 1 - Shanti Rathia W/o Late Jhanak Ram Rathi, Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Shinghijhap, Thana Chhal, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh. 2 - Minor Gayatri D/o Late Jhanak Ram Rathia, Aged About 2 Years R/o Village Shingijhap, Chhal, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh. --- Appellants Versus 1 - Rameshwar Sahu S/o Sonu Sahu, By Occupation Driver, R/o Ward No. 29, Kelo Vihar Colony, Tahsil And District Raigarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raigarh. 3 - District Forest Officer, Dharamjaigarh, Forest Division Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh. 4 - Forest Parichhetradhikari, Chhal, District Raigarh. 5 - Smt. Pramila, D/o Late Jhanak Ram Rathia, Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Nondarha, Tahsil Kartala, District Korba. --- Respondents MAC No. 1890 of 2018 Smt. Pramila D/o Late Jhanak Ram Rathia Aged About 22 Years R/o Village Nondarha, Tahsil Kartala, District Korba --- Appellant Versus 1 - Rameshwar Sahu S/o Sonu Sahu By Occupation Driver, R/o Ward No. 29, Kelo Vihar Colony, Tahsil And District Raigarh. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.02.20 17:54:46 +0530 2 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector, Raigarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 3 - District Forest Officer Dharamjaigarh, Forest Division Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 4 - Forest Circle Officer Chhal, District Raigarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 5 - Shanti Rathia W/o Late Jhanak Ram Rathia, Aged About 27 Years R/o Village Shingijhap, Thana Chhal, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh., District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 6 - (Minor) Gayatri D/o Late Jhanak Ram Rathia, Aged About 2 Years R/o Village Shingijhap, Chhal, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh. (Claimant No. 1 And 2), District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellants : None For Respondents : None Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 19.02.2026 1 Today, when the matters were taken up for hearing and the cases were called out, neither the learned counsel for the appellants nor the learned counsel for the respondents appeared before this Court. Even on the third call of the matters, none appeared to press these appeals. It thus appears that the parties are not interested in prosecuting the present appeals. 2 In view of the continued non-appearance of the parties and absence of any representation, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss these appeals for want of prosecution. 3 3 Accordingly, the present appeals stand dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh