CRWP-4311 IN THE (152) POOJA RAN STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o official respon petitioners at t representation 2. submitted tha 13.04.2026 (A Muktsar Sahib but the same thereon. He fu satisfied if ap 4311-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH RANI AND ANOTHER Versus
OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Digvijay Nagpal, Advocate fo Mr. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ***
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been file tion of India seeking issuance of a w respondents No.2 and 3 to protect rs at the hands of respondents No.4 t tation dated 13.04.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned co d that the petitioners have recentl 26 (Annexure P-5) before the Senior Sahib raising their grievances as me same has not yet been considered a He further submitted that at this st if appropriate directions are issued NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH CRWP-4311-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 16.04.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
cate for the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab en filed under Article 226/227 of the of a writ of mandamus directing the protect the life and liberty of the No.4 to 8 and to take action on their ure P-5). ed counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on Senior Superintendent of Police, Sri as mentioned in the present petition ered and no action has been taken this stage, the petitioners would be issued to respondent No.2-Senior 2026 f the g the the their has on Sri tition aken d be AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-4311 Superintenden representation 3. 4. notice on beha be done in du her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid repre within a perio accordance w petitioners, the order to protec
16.04.2026 Amit Sharma 311-2026 (O&M) (2) tendent of Police, Sri Muktsar Sah tation filed by the petitioners and take Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and in due course. Let a complete set of ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer ma ting anything on the merits of the of at this stage with a direction to r d representation dated 13.04.2026 (An period of 15 days from today, by nce with law. Needless to say, if rs, the official respondents would pro protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   ar Sahib to decide the aforesaid d take necessary action thereon. Senior DAG, Punjab, has advance te and submits that the needful will set of the paperbook be supplied to yer made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is on to respondent No.2 to decide the 26 (Annexure P-5) of the petitioners y, by passing a speaking order in ay, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security in (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
ned:- Yes/No

esaid ance will ed to thout n is e the ners er in the ity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.16 17:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.