- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18102 RSA No. 968 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 968 OF 2023 (MON) BETWEEN: K C MANJULA D/O CHIKKEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS RESIDING AT KYAMANAHALLI (V AND P) HANBALU HOBLI SAKALESHPUR (T) HASSAN (D) - 573 165 …APPELLANT (BY SMT. K.C. MANJULA, PARTY-IN-PERSON - ABSENT) AND: 1. NETRAVATHI, W/O LATE M.S. YUVARAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 2. INDU, D/O LATE M.S. YUVARAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 3. INCHARA, D/O LATE M.S. YUVARAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS Digitally signed by B LAVANYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18102 RSA No. 968 of 2023 4. M Y ASWATH, S/O LATE M.S. YUVARAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS 5. M Y VINAY, W/O LATE M.S. YUVARAJEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS RESPONDENTS NO.1 TO 5 ARE RESIDING AT KYAMANAHALLI VILLAGE AND POST HANBALU HOBLI, SAKALESHPUR T HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 165 6. DINESH K.S S/O. LATE K.D. SHIVAPPA GOWDA AGED 46 YEARS R/AT KYAMANAHALLI VILLAGE ANBANUBALU HOBLI SAKALESHPURA TALUK HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 165. …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.02.2023 PASSED IN RA No. 16/2021 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAKALESHPURA, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 09.04.2021 PASSED IN OS No. 61/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, SAKALESHPUR. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:18102 RSA No. 968 of 2023 ORAL JUDGMENT There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Even on the previous date of hearing, there was no representation. This Court had imposed a cost of Rs.500/- and to rectify the objections by its order dated 20.02.2024. The matter was listed in the year 2024 for rectification of the objections raised by the registry after granting three times adjournments. Thereafter, the matter has been adjourned time and again. Despite granting five to six times adjournment, there is no compliance with regard to rectification of the objections raised by the registry and on 14.01.2026 this Court imposed cost of Rs.2,000/- and to rectify the objections. The same is not paid, nor or the objections are rectified. It appears that the appellant is not interested in continuing with this matter. Hence, this appeal is dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE RCK