Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1751 (ALL)

ANAND KUMAR SAINI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/19300/2026 · 2026-05-17

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 19300 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties, learned Standing Counsel for State- respondents and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "to issue a writ, order or writ of certiorari by quashing the impugned order dated 18.09.2025 (Annexure No. 4 to the writ petition) passed by the Respondent No. 3/ Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Sikandarabad, Bulandshahr in Case No. 11404 of 2025, Computerized Case No. T202511170411404 (Anand Kumar Saini Vs. Ajay Saini and others), filed by the petitioner, U/s 24 of the U.P. Revenue Code-2006." 3. Learned Standing Counsel has raised a preliminary objection that the petitioner has an alternative remedy of filing appeal against the order impugned. 4. Since the petitioner has an alternative remedy, I am not inclined to entertain the instant petition. 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. 6. Certified copy of the orders, if any, be returned to learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining photo copy of the same. May 18, 2026 Ved Prakash Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shashank Singhal, Subodh Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Anand Kumar Saini .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad