ROHINI SANJAY PATIL AND OTHERS v. BABURAO JAYRAM PATIL (ABATED) AND ANOTHER
CA/2890/2026 · 2026-10-07
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17508 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17508 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
928 SA NO. 193 OF 2026.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 SECOND APPEAL NO. 193 OF 2026 Rohini Sanjay Patil And Others VERSUS Baburao Jayram Patil (abated) And Another ... Mr. Mohit Shrikant Shah, Advocate for Appellants WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2890 OF 2026 IN SA/193/2026 ….
CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 07.10.2026 PER COURT :- SECOND APPEAL NO. 193 OF 2026
1. Heard learned Advocate for the Appellants.
2. The following substantial question of law arises for determination: a. Whether the granddaughters are entitled to claim maintenance under Section 22 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956?
3. Issue notice to the Respondents, returnable on
09.12.2026.
4. Call Record and Proceedings. 1 of 2
(( 2 )) 928 SA NO. 193 OF 2026 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2890 OF 2026 IN SA/193/2026
1. Heard learned Advocate for the Applicants.
2. This is an application for granting stay to the execution of the impugned judgment and decree.
3. Prayer Clause (B) cannot be granted, as there is nothing to stay. There is no immovable property involved in the matter so as to grant the relief sought in terms of Prayer Clause (C). As regards the relief sought in terms of Prayer Clause (D), the Applicants are at liberty to file an appropriate application before the competent Court. Thus, no relief can be granted in the present application. Accordingly, the application is rejected.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] HRJadhav 2 of 2