Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1750 (GAU)

DR. MRIGEN SAIKIA v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS.

WP(C)/5974/2023 · 2026-02-05

Rajesh Mazumdar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010224462023 2026:GAU-AS:1727 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5974/2023 DR. MRIGEN SAIKIA S/O- LATE MONI RAM SAIKIA, R/O- BOGORITAL, BOTAHGULI, P.O. PANJABARI, P.S. DISPUR, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN- 781037. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 3 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06, KAMRUP(M), ASSAM, PIN- 781006. 2:THE DIRECTOR ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND VETERINARY ETC. DEPARTMENT GUWAHATI-03 KAMRUP(M) ASSAM PIN- 781003. 3:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL (A AND E) MAIDAMGAON GUWAHATI-781029. 4:THE TREASURY OFFICER KAMRUP TREASURY ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : xxxx, Advocate for the Respondent : SC, A.H and V. DEPT., SC, FINANCE,SC, AG Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 06.02.2026 Ms R Kataky, learned counsel appears on behalf of Mr M M Kataky, learned Standing Counsel, AH & V Department. Mr M Bhatta, learned Standing Counsel appears on behalf of the Accountant General. 2. Office Note dated 22.01.2026 reflects that the note of the Process Server, who had gone to serve the notice as directed by this Court, on the petitioner, has reported that the petitioner is no more and that no one agreed to sign the notice as a witness 3. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner since the counsel for the petitioner, on earlier occasion, submitted before this Court that the brief had been withdrawn by the petitioner from the counsel. 4. In view of the circumstances, this writ petition is closed with the observation that in the event the legal heirs of the petitioners intend to re-agitate the issues raised in this writ petition, they would be at liberty to file appropriate application for revival of the writ petition. 5. Writ petition is closed on the aforesaid terms. JUDGE Comparing Assistant