[2026:JHHC:18214] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.5036 of 2026 ------ Md. Amzad @ Amzad Gaddi ageda bout – 38 years S/o Md. Kalim R/o Village- Muslim Colony, Nala Road, P.O. & P.S. Hindpiri, Dist. Ranchi, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Md. Faiz Ur Rahman, Advocate For the State : Mr. Someshwar Roy, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No:-03 Dated:-22-06-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.37 of 2020 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 80 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 387/504/506/120B/307/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, attempted to murder the informant of the case by firing upon him but he managed to ran away and saved his life and the firing was done for the purpose of realising extortion money on behalf of Aman Sahu and Sujeet Sinha Gang. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. It is also submitted that as mentioned in para-4 of the supplementary affidavit, no T.I. Parade has been conducted by the Investigating Officer of the case and without conducting the same, charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner but no witness has been examined as yet. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 22.11.2025 as is evident from para-9 of the instant bail application. It is next submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, have already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 01.03.2021 passed in B.A. No.1864 of 2021. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge-II, Latehar in connection with Latehar P.S. Case No.37 of 2020 corresponding to S.T. Case No. 80 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 22.06.2026 Saroj/