Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17494 (AP)

C.VENKATA SIVA SATYANARAYANA v. C.BHAVANI

CRLRC/346/2018 · 2026-02-22

B V L N Chakravarthi

Public Interest Litigationbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010084362018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] MONDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 346/2018 Between: 1. C.VENKATA SIVA SATYANARAYANA, R/O. D.NO. 1-4-21, RTC WORKSHOP ROAD, BHAVANIPURAM, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. C BHAVANI, R/O. H.NO. 1-260/3, KANDRIKA GUDEM, SAPOTA THOTA, BHAGYANAGAR COLONY, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. CHIPILA MOHAN, R/O. H.NO. 1-260/3, KANDRIKA GUDEM, SAPOTA THOTA, BHAGYANAGAR COLONY, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. CHIPILA PRASAD, R/O. H.NO. 1-260/3, KANDRIKA GUDEM, SAPOTA THOTA, BHAGYANAGAR COLONY, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND STATE OF AP. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to present this Memorandum of Ground of criminal Revision case against the order dt.23.08.2017 passed in M.C. No.115 of 2015 on the file of the XIV 2 Addl. District and sessions Judge-cum-Addl. Family Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District, for the following among other. IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 18 days in filing the Criminal revision case before this Hon’ble court and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To stay the order dt.23.08.2017 passed in M.C.No.115 of 2015 on the file of the XIV Addl. District and sessions Judge-cum-Addl. Family Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District, and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. N PAVAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.346 OF 2018 O R D E R: Sri N.Pavan Kumar, learned counsel for the revision petitioner would submit that pending the revision, the matter was compromised before the trial Court. 2. Sri C.Panini Somayaji, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State is in attendance. 3. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this case shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 23.02.2026 Pmk 4 25 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No. 346 OF 2018 Date: 23.02.2026 Pmk