1 of 2 941-CA.14007.2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 941 FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.26553 OF 2013 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14007 OF 2013 IN FAST/26553/2013 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS DEUKABAI MARUTI GARJE ... Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP for the Appellants/State. ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14008 OF 2013 IN FAST/26553/2013 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER VERSUS DEUKABAI MARUTI GARJE … Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP for the Appellants/State. ... CORAM : SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J. DATE : 1st OCTOBER, 2026 P.C.:- CIVIL APPLICATION NO.14007 OF 2013:- 1. By this application, the Applicant is seeks condonation of delay of 425 days in filing first appeal. 2. Considering the averments made in the application, delay is condone. Accordingly, the application is allowed. FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO.26553 OF 2013:- 3. Since the acquisition proceedings pertain to the year 2003, 2026:BHC-AUG:47353 2 of 2 941-CA.14007.2013 the appeal is heard finally with the consent of the learned Advocates for the respective parties. 4. By this appeal, the Appellants are aggrieved by the Judgment and award dated 03.04.2012 passed by the learned District Judge-2, Beed in L.A.R. No.883/2010. 5. Mr. A. D. Wange, learned AGP for the Appellant/State submits that the compensation enhanced by the learned Reference Court does not exceed four times the amount awarded by the SLAO. 6. In fact the State Government vide Government Resolution No.Sankirna-2014/Prak.Kra.4/Bham-1/A-4 dated 03.11.2016 with Corrigendum dated 23.02.2017 and 13.08.2018 to the said Government Resolution, took a decision not to challenge the reference, if compensation is enhanced only upto four times. 7. Therefore, I do not find any reason to intervene with the impugned orders. Hence, the present Appeal is dismissed. 8. In view of dismissal of the Appeal, pending Civil Applications, if any, do not survive and are disposed of accordingly. (SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J.) Tauseef