Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17485 (JHR)

SHANKAR GOSWAMI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./3196/2026 · 2026-06-22

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18089 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3196 of 2026 ------ 1. Shankar Goswami, son of Late Jay Narayan Goswami, aged about 54 years 2. Prem Goswami, son of Shankar Goswami, aged about 20 years 3. Laksh Kumar Goswami @ Lakshya Goswami, son of Lashman Goswami, aged about 20 years, All are resident of Tand Mohanpur Side, P.O. Jainamore, P.S. Jaridih, District Bokaro Jharkhan .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners : Mr. Pradeep Kumar Nayak, Advocate For the State : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, A.P.P. ------ 02/22.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jaridih P.S. Case No. 131 of 2024, registered for the offence under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 127(1), 115(2), 118(1), 117(2), 109, 121(1), 121(2), 132, 324(5) 308(2), 303(2) and 352 of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 8B of the National Highway Act, 1956 pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that due to road accident, road blockage was made for demand of compensation and there general and omnibus allegations against 15 named and 01 unknown person. He further submits that agitation was going on due to road accident and the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 18 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the allegations are there of blocking the road. 5. Considering that due to road accident, the petitioners and others started agitating and blocking the road and there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons and further they are having no criminal antecedent as disclosed in para 18 of the petition, in the attending facts and circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2026:JHHC:18089 6. Accordingly, the above-named petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender, they shall be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat, in connection with Jaridih P.S. Case No. 131 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Anit Uploaded 23.06.2026