Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17485 (BOM)

RAJU RAMRAO PAWAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

ABA/1769/2026 · 2026-10-07

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 938 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1769 OF 2026 RAJU RAMRAO PAWAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ... Mr. Subhash S Nade, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. B. Jadhav, APP for the Respondent/State Mr. M. B. Sandanshiv, Advocate for the Informant WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1758 OF 2026 DHAIRYASHIL BHAGWATRAO THOMBRE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER … Mr. Angad Lala Kanade, Advocate for Applicant Mr. S. B. Jadhav, APP for the Respondent/State CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J. DATED : 9th OCTOBER, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. This motion is moved for speaking to the minutes of the order dated 07.10.2026. 2. Learned Advocate for the Applicant submits that, in the operative part of the said order, at Clause No. (i) Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1678/2026 has been inadvertently mentioned instead of Anticipatory Bail Application No. 1758/2026. He, therefore, seeks correction of the said aba1769.26.odt 1 of 2 2026:BHC-AUG:47060 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated // inadvertent error. 3. In view of the above, the necessary correction be carried out in the order dated 07.10.2026, and the corrected order be uploaded accordingly. ( R. M. JOSHI, J.) ssp aba1769.26.odt 2 of 2 This Order is Speaking to Minutes order of order dated //