LOKESH KUMAR S/O SHRI KISHAN GOPAL KHANDELWAL v. GAYATRI RATHORE
CCP/310/2025 · 2026-02-11
Praveer Bhatnagar
Contempt Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17479 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 17479 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:6471] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 310/2025 Lokesh Kumar S/o Shri Kishan Gopal Khandelwal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Plot No. B-85, Govind Nagar, 11-B, Niwaru Road, Jhotwara, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus
1. Gayatri Rathore, Principal Secretary Department Of Medical And Health Services, Secretariat, Jaipur
2. Shri Rakesh Kumar Sharma, The Director (Non Gazetted), Medical Health And Family Welfare Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur
3. Shri Yogendra Sharma, Chief Medical And Health Officer, Alwar, Distt. Alwar
4. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Services, Secretariat, Jaipur ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Pradeep Singh, Adv. Mr. Jitesh Kumawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Tanvisha Pant, Adv. for Mr. Vigyan Shah, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 11/02/2026
1. It is contended by learned counsel for the respondent that vide order dated 10.06.2025, Annexure-R/1, the representation submitted by the petitioner has been decided.
2. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that though the representation has been decided, however, the petitioner has not been appointed against the vacant post.
3. Heard and perused the material available on record.
[2026:RJ-JP:6471] (2 of 2) [CCP-310/2025]
4. In the impugned order the Court specifically directed that the respondent shall consider the representation submitted by the petitioner.
5. The respondents have considered the petitioner's representation and passed a speaking order vide Annexure-R/1. It was not directed by the Court that the petitioner shall be appointed against the vacant post.
6. Considering the above facts, the instant contempt petition is
disposed of and rule is discharged.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-91