Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17476 (GAU)

M/S GARV ENTERPRISE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS.

WP(C)/7463/2025 · 2026-01-08

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010286632025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/7463/2025 M/S GARV ENTERPRISE A PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS PLACE OF BUSINESS AT WARD NO.3, SHANTINAGAR, KOKRAJHAR, REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, BINITA AGARWALA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, GOVT. OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. 2:THE DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE ASSAM KHANAPARA GUWAHATI. 3:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. KHANAPARA GUWAHATI 4:THE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR PROCUREMENT COMMITTEE ASSAM SEEDS CORPORATION LTD. KHANAPARA GUWAHATI-22 5:M/S SHRIRAM BIOSEED GENETICS A DIVISION OF DCM SHRIRAM LIMITED Page No.# 2/3 HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT HYDRABAD TELENGANA-500033. 6:M/S AAMARA INDIA HAFLONG DIMA HASAO ASSAM. 7:M/S KHAN BROTHERS MACHKHOWA GUWAHATI ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR B P BORAH, MISS. J GOGOI,MR P J DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : SC, AGRI. DEPARTMENT, SC, A S C BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 09-01-2026 Heard Shri B. P. Borah, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Shri A. N. Sarma learned counsel appearing on behalf of Shri S. Chamaria, learned Standing Counsel, Assam Seeds Corporation. Shri B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Agriculture Department is also present. When this matter had come up for consideration on the previous occasions, instructions were directed to be taken by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Shri Borah, the learned counsel for the petitioner has fairly submitted that the last date for submission of the supply is already over and therefore no effective relief can be granted by this Court in exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. He however prays for a liberty to approach the Civil Court, to claim damage. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the development, while this writ petition is closed, liberty is granted to the petitioner to approach the appropriate Page No.# 3/3 forum for claim of damage, if so advised. If such claim is made, the same is to be considered strictly in accordance with law. JUDGE Comparing Assistant