CRWP-5188 IN THE (167 ) AFTAB AND STATE OF P CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o the official re petitioners at t representation 2. submitted tha 02.05.2026 b (Annexure P petition but 5188-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH Da AND ANOTHER Versus
OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Gupta, Advoc Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior D ****
HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fil tion of India seeking issuance of a w cial respondents No.1 to 3 to protect rs at the hands of respondent No.4 to tation dated 02.05.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned coun d that the petitioners have recently 26 before the Senior Superintend re P-5) raising their grievances as the same has not yet been consid JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH
CRWP-5188-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 04.05.2026 ... Petitioners
...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA
Advocate for the petitioners nior DAG, Punjab een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing rotect the life and liberty of the o.4 to 6 and to take action on their ure P-5). d counsel for the petitioners has cently filed a representation on intendent of Police, Gurdaspur es as mentioned in the present considered and no action has been AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.04 19:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-5188 taken thereon would be satis Senior Superi representation 3. 4. notice on beha be done in due her during the 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid rep petitioners wit order in accord petitioners, the in order to pro
04.05.2026 Amit Sharma 5188-2026 (O&M) (2) ereon. He further submitted that at e satisfied if appropriate directions are Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspu tation filed by the petitioners and take Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Senior n behalf of the respondents-State and s in due course. Let a complete set of th ng the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer mad ting anything on the merits of the c of at this stage with a direction to res d representation dated 02.05.2026 rs within a period of 15 days from to accordance with law. Needless to say, rs, the official respondents would pro to protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:
   hat at this stage, the petitioners ns are issued to respondent No.2- rdaspur to decide the aforesaid d take necessary action thereon. enior DAG, Punjab, has advance e and submits that the needful will et of the paperbook be supplied to r made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is to respondent No.2 to decide the .2026 (Annexure P-5) of the rom today, by passing a speaking to say, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security (MANISHA BATRA)
JUDGE
ned:- Yes/No

AMIT SHARMA 2026.05.04 19:49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.