1 / 2 2026:CGHC:8817 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 1883 of 2026 • Ramesh Kumar Sharma S/o Late Ganpat Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o Q.No-B/290, Shaktinagar, Jarhi P.O. Bhatgaon Dist- Surjapur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1. SECL Through- Its Chairman Cum Managing Director Headquarter At Seepat Road Bilaspur Dist- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2. Director (Personnel) SECL Headquarter At Seepat Road Bilaspur Dist- Bilaspur (C.G.) 3. Chief General Manager SECL Bhatgaon Area, Bhatgaon P.S. Bhatgaon Dist- Surajpur (C.G.) 4. Area Personnel Manager SECL Kalyani Sub- Area Bhatgaon Area P.S. Bhatgaon Dist- Surajpur (C.G.) 5. Mines Manager Sivani Mines SECL Bhatgaon Area P.S. Bhatgaon Dist- Surajpur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Jai Prakash Shukla, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Sudhir Kumar Bajpai, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER ON BOARD 19/02/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the order Annexure P-1 dated 18/19.11.2025 passed by the respondents-department wherein claim of petitioner for subsistence allowance during the period of suspension has been rejected. 2. Perusal of order Annexure P-1 would show that petitioner did not cause his presence at the place of posting. Ld. counsel for petitioner made an attempt to submit that the higher officers have cautioned the incoming and outgoing PAWAN KUMAR JHA Digitally signed by PAWAN KUMAR JHA 2 / 2 receipt section to not to accept any document from the petitioner and therefore petitioner has forwarded a letter/ application through registered post. Petitioner has also given intimation to the authorities that his son was suffering from mental illness and he has to take care of his son and therefore petitioner could not give his presence at the place of posting, however, no document(s) in this regard has been enclosed along with writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that at this stage he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file better constituted petition along with all supporting documents. 4. In view of above, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for by learned counsel for petitioner. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) pwn JUDGE