Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15029 WP No. 4228 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.4228 OF 2026 (EDN-RES) BETWEEN:
1.
DINESH COACHING CENTRE REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI.N.V. DINESH, S/O. LATE VISHWESWARIAH, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.445, 1ST CROSS, MARUTHI TEMPLE ROAD, KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU- 570023. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. Y.K. NARAYANA SHARMA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY CHIEF SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU -560001.
2.
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR (ADMINISTRATION), DEPARTMENT OF SCHOOL EDUCATION MYSURU-570001.
Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15029 WP No. 4228 of 2026
3.
SRI. SRINIVAS PRASAD, S/O LATE PRABHAKAR, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.444, 1ST CROSS, MARUTHI TEMPLE ROAD, KUVEMPU NAGAR, MYSURU-570023. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 & R2;
SRI. G.S. VENKATA SUBBARAO, ADVOCATE FO RR3)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SETTING ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 29.01.2026 PASSED IN CASE NO.G2/1353/TU NO-01/2025-26 3987 BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT AS PER THE ANNEXURE-E, AND ALLOW THE ABOVE WRIT PETITION OR PASS OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS OR DIRECTIONS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE
FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Sri. G.S. Venkata Subbarao, learned counsel, has filed vakalatnama on behalf of Respondent No. 3.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15029 WP No. 4228 of 2026
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3. In this writ petition, the petitioner is assailing the order dated 29.01.2026 (Annexure-E) passed by Respondent No. 2.
4. A perusal of the arguments advanced by the
learned counsel for the parties, as well as the writ papers, indicates that Respondent No.2 has issued the impugned Official Memorandum dated 29.01.2026, and thereby quashing the registration/permission granted to the petitioner to conduct a coaching centre.
5. On careful consideration of Annexure-E, it is evident that no material has been considered by Respondent No.2, nor there are any allegations made against the petitioner, as is apparent from the impugned order.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15029 WP No. 4228 of 2026
6. In that view of the matter, the impugned
order/ Official Memorandum dated 29.01.2026 is passed without application of mind and does not disclose any valid or sufficient reasons for quashing the registration of the coaching centre run by the petitioner. Hence, the petition is allowed. The order / Official Memorandum dated 29.01.2026 (Annexure-E) passed by Respondent No. 2 is hereby quashed as the matter shall not fall within the purview of the provisions contained in the Karnataka Tutorial Institutions (Registration and Regulation) Rules, 2001.
SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE
SB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7