Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17469 (JHR)

SURANG YADAV ALIAS SURAN YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./5547/2026 · 2026-06-22

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:18050 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5547 of 2026 ------ Surang Yadav @ Suran Yadav, aged about 22 years, s/o Ayodhya Yadav, r/o Village-Navaahar, P.O.+P.S.- Charkapathar, Dist.-Jamui (Bihar) … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Saket Kumar, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 22.06.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. No. 505 of 2023 arising out of Jasidih P.S. Case No.443 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under sections 395/364A of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the offence of abduction of the victims of the case for demanding ransom and also committed dacoity. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has not been put to T.I. Parade as has been mentioned in paragraph no.10 of the bail application. It is then submitted that though four witnesses have been examined during the trial of the case but none of them have stated anything to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner is not named in the FIR. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 23.12.2020, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 22 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the period of custody undergone by the petitioner and the facts of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.S.J.-III, Deoghar, in connection with S.T. No. 505 of 2023 arising out of Jasidih P.S. Case No.443 of 2013 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 22.06.2026 Gunjan-