$~114 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010408632026 + W.P.(C) 12651/2026 FATIMA KOUNSER .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhisht Hela & Mr. Syed Rafat Jahan, Advs. versus NATIONAL TESTING AGENCY & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Ms Manisha Agrawal Narain, CGSC witn Mr Nipun Jain, Adv and Mr Sarthak Rana, GP for R2-6 Mr. Sanjay Khanna, Standing Counsel, Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Ms. Jaya Choudhary, Ms. Meemansa Dixit, Mr. Naman Dwivedi, Mr. Saurabh Pandey, Advs. for NTA CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R % 02.09.2026 CM APPL. 58602/2026 Allowed subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 12651/2026 1. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following prayers:- “a. Issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus (or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction) directing Respondent No. 1 (NTA) to present and show the Original OMR Sheet of the petitioner and award marks for two questions if discrepancy found. b. Issue Directions to constitute an independent technical expert committee or Special Investigation Team or Judicial This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/09/2026 at 11:58:45 Committee headed by retired or sitting Justice of Hon'ble Supreme Court to investigate and examine the allegations regarding OMR Tampering and High Cut-off. c. Issue directions in the Nature of Mandamus to Respondent no.1 and respondent no. 2, to reduce the cut-off marks. d. Issue Writ in nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to pay compensation and cost of litigation to the petitioners.....” 2. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner had marked question Nos. 143 and 161 with option Nos. 4 and 3 respectively, which were the correct answers. 3. However, the downloaded OMR sheet shows the petitioner having marked option Nos. 3 and 1 to question Nos. 143 and 161 respectively. 4. For the said reasons, the respondent No. 1/NTA was directed to produce the original OMR sheet which has been brought to the Court and has been perused by me as well as the learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. The answer to question No. 143 is shown as option No. 3 and to question No. 161, it is shown as option No. 1 as marked by the petitioner. 6. For the said reasons, Mr. Hela, learned counsel for the petitioner, does not press the present petition and hence, the same is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. 7. The photocopies of the original documents shown to the Court are taken on record. JASMEET SINGH, J SEPTEMBER 2, 2026 / (MS) This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/09/2026 at 11:58:45