Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17462 (JHR)

PARMANAND SINGH v. M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LTD., THRO ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR

WPC/3805/2026 · 2026-06-19

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:18037 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3805 of 2026 Parmanand Singh, aged about 32 years, son of Late Jitan Singh, resident of Village Lalchak, P.O. Kankomath, P.S. Katras, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1.M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, through its Chairman cum Managing Director, having its office at Koyla Bhawan, Koyla Nagar, P.O.- Koyla Nagar, P.S.- Saraidhela, District - Dhanbad. 2. The General Manager, Katras Area-4 of M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, Dhanbad, P.O. -Katras, P.S.-Katras, District-Dhanbad. 3. Project Officer, Keshalpur Colliery, Katras Area-4 M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, P.O. - Katras, P.S.-Katras, District-Dhanbad 4. Personnel Manager, Keshalpur Colliery, (Ktaras Area-4) M/s Bharat Coking Coal Limited, P.O. Katras, P.S. Katras, District-Dhanbad. ... … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sujit Kumar Lala, Advocate Mr. Jeetendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Dr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Sharon Toppo, Advocate -------- Order No. 2 /Dated: 19th June 2026 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for giving compassionate appointment to him father of whom died in the year, 1999. 2. From the very fact it appears that the deceased employee died almost twenty five years ago and the petitioner is approaching this Court now, as such, the sole purpose of compassionate appointment will be frustrated if at all the prayer of the petitioner is allowed. 3. Even otherwise as per the respondent Coal Company Regulation compassionate appointment has to be given only when the application for compassionate appointment is given within 18 months from the date of death which is absent in the instant case. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ application is dismissed in limine. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 19th June 2026 Amit Uploaded on 23/06/2026