Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:9178
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 759 of 2026 1 - Jaypal Singh Porte S/o Shri Phoolsingh Porte, Aged About 50 Years Agriculturist, R/o Village Tangiyatola, Sarbahara, Tehsil Pendra Road, District Gourela- Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.) 2 - Govind Singh Porte, S/o Shri Phoolsingh Porte, Aged About 66 Years Agricultur- ist, R/o Village Tangiyatola, Sarbahara, Tehsil Pendra Road, District Gourela- Pen- dra- Marwahi (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Tribal Welfare, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Commissioner, Department Of Tribal Welfare, District Gourela- Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.) 3 - Collector, District Gourela- Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.) 4 - Tahsildar, Pendra Road, District Gourela- Pendra- Marwahi (C.G.)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : Mr. Ankit Pandey, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Purnendu Khichariya, Panel Lawyer. Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.02.23 15:10:51 +0530
2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi
Order On Board 20-2-2026 1
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that Revenue Case No. 202406280400061/ A-68 year 2023-24 is pending consideration before respondent No. 4/Tehsildar, Pendra Road under Section 250 of the CG Land Revenue Code since June 2024, but the same has not been decided yet. He further submits that despite pendency of aforesaid revenue case, the respondent No. 4 has directed the petitioner to vacate the land. Therefore, he prays that, this petition may be disposed of directing respondent No. 4 to decide the case expeditiously within stipulated period, and till then, interim protection may be granted to the petitioner with regard to the subject land. 2 Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection to the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 3 Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4 Since the Revenue Case No. 202406280400061/ A-68 year 2023-24 is pending consideration before respondent No. 4/Tehsildar, Pendra Road since June, 2024, and perusal of order sheets shows that no material proceeding has been done except giving dates, therefore, having considered the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioners, which is not opposed by the State Counsel, this writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.4/Tehsildar Pendra Road to decide the aforesaid revenue case in accordance with law as early as possible preferably within a period of 45 days from the date of receipt /
3 submission of a copy of this order. Till then, no coercive step shall be taken against the petitioner in respect of the subject land. 5 With aforesaid observations and directions, the writ petition stands
disposed of. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands
disposed off. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak