( 2026:JHHC:18068 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3191 of 2026 1. Julesha Bibi @ Julekha Bibi aged about 60 years, wife of Hadish Sheikh, resident of village Pasiya, Post Office Madhupur, Police Station- Madhupur, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand 2. Jubeda Bibi aged about 35 years, daughter of Hadish Sheikh, wife of Rajaul Shekh, resident of village Suggapahadi, Post Office Madhupur, Police Station-Madhpur, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand 3. Hazra Bibi @ Hazara Bibi, about 30 years wife of Abutalib Shekh, resident of village bara, Post Office Pathrol, Police Station-Pathrol, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand 4. Sehra Khatun @ Sehra Khatoon @ Sehra Bibi @ Nankhi Bibi @ Nanki Bibi @ Nanhki Bibi, aged about 31 years, wife of Kallu Shekh, daughter of Hadish Sheikh resident of village Sirsia, Post Office-Pathrol, Police Station-Pathrol, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Satyanshu Shubham, Advocate For the State : Mr. Azeemuddin, A.P.P. 02/ 22.06.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Madhupur (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026 registered under sections 126(1), 115(2), 109(1), 123, 303(2), 85, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and under section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M, Madhupur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners are inlaws of the informant and false allegations are made of poisoning. He next submits that although the informant was admitted in the hospital but after two days she has been discharged and doctor has not confirmed the case of poisoning. He next submits that there are general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons for demand of dowry and torture. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. ( 2026:JHHC:18068 ) 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that allegations are there against the petitioners and husband of the informant of administering poison upon the informant. 5. In the impugned order it has come that doctor has not confirmed the case of poisoning. Although, the informant was treated in the hospital but after two days she has been discharged. There are general and omnibus allegations of demand of dowry and assault. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M, Madhupur, in connection with Madhupur (Mahila) P.S. Case No. 03 of 2026, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.22.06.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-