( 2026:JHHC:18187 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2941 of 2026 1. Basant Yadav aged about 28 years, son of late Durgesh Yadav 2. Chandrawati Devi, @ Chandrawati Kunwar @ Chandravti Kunwar, aged about 55 years, wife of late Durgesh Yadav 3. Santosh Yadav aged about 21 years son of late Durgesh Yadav All are resident of village Dandai, P.O. and P.S. Dandai and District-Garhwa ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Apurv Krishna, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prabhu Dayal Agrawal, Spl.P.P. 02/ 22.06.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dandai P.S. Case No. 29 of 2026, registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 352, 351 (2), 351(3), 3(5) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Garhwa. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. He next submits that altercation took place due to land dispute. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioners assaulted the son of the informant and pursuant to that three fingers of his hand were severed and there was fracture of left thumb. 5. In the F.I.R there is direct allegation against the accused persons of assault upon the son of the informant and pursuant to that there was amputation of three fingers while fracture of left thumb was also found. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners and accordingly, their prayer of anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. Dt.22.06.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-