Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 17444 (HP)

BAJAR SINGH v. RAKESH KANWAR AND ANOTHER

COPC/591/2026 · 2026-07-27

Sushil Kukreja

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 ( 2026:HHC:30725 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 591 of 2026 Decided on: 27.07.2026 ________________________________________________ Bajar Singh ....Petitioner Versus Rakesh Kanwar & Anr. …Respondents _ Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Naresh Kaul and Ms. Sheetal Kaul, Advocates. For the respondents : Mr. Raj Kumar Negi, Additional Advocate General. Sushil Kukreja, Judge (oral) Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record communication dated 25.07.2026, wherein, it has been stated that claim of the petitioner has been considered and budget amounting to Rs. 1,39,406/- has been sanctioned in his favour by the Government vide letter dated 25.07.2026. The said budget has been allocated to the Block Elementary Education Officer, Gehra for its disbursement to the petitioner. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 ( 2026:HHC:30725 ) 2. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid communication, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and the matter is closed. 3. However, if the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to avail appropriate remedy, as available to him, under the law. 4. The petition is disposed of, so also pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) 27th July, 2026 Judge (raman)