Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8108 WP No. 1671 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 1671 OF 2026 (SCST-) BETWEEN:
SRI. BAILAPPA S/O. LATE NARASHIVAAIAH AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/AT NO.5972, GOVINDAPPA LAY-OUT, TBS BUS STOP, SUBHASH NAGAR MAIN ROAD, NELAMANGALA TALUK, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT-562 123. …PETITIONER (BY SRI.ADINARAYANAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI.MALI PATIL DODDAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU SOUTH DISTRICT B.M ROAD, RAMANAGARA BENGALURU SOUTH - 562 159. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB-DIVISION, MINI VIDHAN SOUDHA, RAMANAGARA, BENGALURU SOUTH - 562 159. 3. SMT. VANARATHNAMMA. B D/O LATE BASAVAIAH, WIFE OF SHIVALINGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS. Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8108 WP No. 1671 of 2026
4. SRI. YOGESH KUMAR S.S.
S/O VANARATHNAMMA. B AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.3 AND 4 ARE R/AT NO.972, RAJAGOPAL NAGAR, RAJANI FORM ROAD, PEENYA 2ND STAGE, BANGALURU - 560 058. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.V.SESHU, HCGP FOR R1 AND R2)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE R-1 IN PTCL/17/2025 ON DTD.06.11.2025 WHICH IS PRODUCED AT ANNX-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader takes notice for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Notice to respondent Nos.3 and 4 is not necessary for the following reasons. 2. The petitioner herein is questioning the order passed by the Deputy Commissioner at Annexure-A dated 06.11.2025, on the ground that the Deputy Commissioner could not have remanded the matter back to the Assistant Commissioner for fresh consideration. - 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8108 WP No. 1671 of 2026
3. Having heard the learned counsel for petitioner, the learned High Court Government Pleader and on perusing the petition papers, this Court is of the considered opinion that there is no infirmity found in the impugned order passed by the Deputy Commissioner.
The Deputy Commissioner found that the Assistant Commissioner passed an order without verifying the original Grant Register, Saguvali Chit, Issue Register etc., and accordingly, the matter has been remanded with a direction to the Assistant Commissioner to verify from the original Grant Register, the factum of the grant said to have been made in favour of the original grantee Sri.Basavaiah s/o late Narashivaiah. 4. It is the bounden and duty of the Assistant Commissioner to call for the original Grant Register, Saguvali Chit, Issue Register and verify regarding the claim made by the applicant that the land was granted in favour of Sri.Basavaiah s/o Narashivaiah. The Assistant Commissioner has to record a finding as to whether the grant was made in favour of the said person, whether he belongs to a Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe Community and having regard to the date of the grant,
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8108 WP No. 1671 of 2026 what is the rule that would apply in the matter of non- alienation. 5. For the reasons stated above, since this Court is convinced that there is no infirmity in the order of the Deputy Commissioner, the writ petition stands dismissed. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE GPG List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29