APHC010086822026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 8317/2026 Between: 1. GADDALA PERCY ALIAS PERSAMMA, W/O NAGA RAJU AGED 40 YEARS OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O BOYAREVULA VELGODE, NANDYAL ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT VELAGAPUDI AMARAVATHI 522238 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT 518501 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KARIVENA, ATMAKUR, NANDYAL DISTRICT 518533 4. THE TAHSILDAR, VELGODE, NANDYAL DISTRICT 518533 5. LANKE GUNDAMMA, W/O BALA SWAMY AGED NOT KNOWN OCC. NOT KNOWN R/O BOYAREVULA VILLAGE, VELGODE NANDYAL 518501 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the respondents in refusing to grant Pattadar Passbook and online mutation in favour of the petitioner in respect of land in Survey No.265/B2, Ac.2.50 cents, Boyarevula Village,Velugodu Mandal is illegal, arbitrary, unjust, improper in violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Article 14, 16, 21 and 300 A of the 2 Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to issue Pattadar Passbook, and effect online mutation in favour of the petitioner forthwith and Set aside the notice Rc.No.E796/2025 dated 01.09.2025 issued under Rule 3 of the A.P. Assigned Lands (Prohibition of Transfers) Rules, 2007 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings pursuant to notice Rc.No.E796/2025 dated 01.09.2025 by direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and cultivation of the petitioner over the schedule land pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PAMARTHY RATHNAKAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 3 The Court made the following ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4. 2. The issuance of notice to the 5th respondent is dispensed with, as no prejudice would cause to her, even if it is disposed of in her absence. 3. This Writ Petition was filed questioning the Form I Notice issued by the 4th respondent dated 01.09.2025, alleging that the petitioner has violated the conditions of assignment and alienated the subject land in favour of the 5th respondent, by way of an agreement dated 10.05.2022. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, pursuant to the said Notice, the petitioner submitted her explanation to the 4th respondent, but the same was not considered so far and there is a threat of high-handed action by the 4th respondent over the subject land. 5. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for the respondent Nos.1 to 4, submits that the petitioner’s explanation will be considered by the 4th respondent following the due procedure. 6. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to submit her explanation afresh, enclosing all the necessary documents, in support of her claim to the above said Form I Notice dated 01.09.2025, within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. On receipt of such explanation from the petitioner, the 4th respondent shall proceed with the necessary enquiry, strictly in accordance 4 with law, pursuant to the above said Form I Notice dated 01.09.2025, by hearing all the parties concerned, including the petitioner and the 5th respondent, giving due opportunity, upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (03) months thereafter. Pending enquiry, there shall be an order of status-quo as on today to be maintained with respect to the subject land as detailed in the schedule of the Form I Notice of the 4th respondent dated 01.09.2025. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 31.03.2026 SCH 5 197 THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN W.P.No.8317 of 2026 Date: 31.03.2026 SCH