FAROOQ AHMAD DAR v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND OTHERS
WP(C)/1445/2026 · 2026-07-07
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1744 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1744 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1445/2026 CM(3804/2026).
Farooq Ahmad Dar.
…Applicant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: None. VERSUS
Union Territory Of J And K And Others.
…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Zaffar Qadri, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE.
ORDER 07.07.2026
1. On account of the absence of Mr. Firdous Ahmad Mir, learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is under no iota of doubt that the institution of this writ petition is aimed at for some other objective rather than what appears to be. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
2. Interim direction(s), if any, as on date shall stand vacated.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 07.07.2026 Bisma Jan.
133 Suppl-I