Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1744 (CHH)

SANJAY HALDAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/6670/2025 · 2026-02-19

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:9146 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6670 of 2025 1 - Sanjay Haldar S/o Late Mr. Gyanendra Haldar Aged About 44 Years Occupation - Lab Technician, Govt. Danteshwari Post-Graduation College, Dantewada, District- Dantewada. R/o Ward No. 10, Bangali Camp No. 01, Old Market, Town- Bacheli, District- Dantewada (C.G.) --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Additional Director Directorate Of Higher Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, Dantewada (C.G.) 4 - The Principal Govt. Danteshwari Post-Graduation College, Dantewada, District- Dantewada (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS system) For Petitioner : Mr. Mohd. Naqeeb, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Virendra Verma, P.L. Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order On Board 20/02/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this petition seeking following relief (s) :- “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to consider the claim/request of the petitioner to update his previous service book in order to get all the benefit for which he is legally entitled, in furtherance of justice. BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Digitally signed by BALRAM PRASAD DEWANGAN Date: 2026.02.23 18:42:42 +0530 2 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus, directing the Respondent No.2 to kindly consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 10.03.2025 which is still pending before him in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief/reliefs which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case with cost of the petition may also please be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner was initially appointed as Lecturer. While working on the post of Lecturer, petitioner has submitted an application for appointment on the post of Lab Technician after seeking prior approval/permission from the concerned authorities. Petitioner became successful, he after tendering his technical resignation, joined the post of Lab Technician on 15.03.2013. Petitioner thereafter submitted an application before the concerned authority for counting his earlier period of service (as Lecturer) to be service period of post of Lab Technician. Concerned Principal has forwarded the application to the higher authorities, however, till date, no decision has been taken, therefore, direction be issued to concerned authorities to take decision on the claim of petitioner for treating and counting the earlier service period as Lecturer to the service period of Lab Technician. 3. Learned State counsel submits that in view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for petitioner to consider his claim within specified time frame, he is having no objection. 4. On due consideration on the submission of learned counsel for respective parties, nature of grievance raised, this petition is disposed 3 of permitting petitioner to submit fresh comprehensive representation before the concerned authorities along with supporting documents and in the event, such representation is submitted, the concerned authorities shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within further period of three weeks from the date of receipt of representation. 5. With the aforesaid observations and directions, this petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Balram