[2026:JHHC:17860] -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2862 of 2026 Tejas @ Tejas Thakur @ Tejash Thakur, aged about 20 years, Son of Subhash Chandra Thakur, resident of Kamlakant Road near Pahari Mandir, Nawatoli, P.O. G.P.O., P.S. Sukhdeonagar, District-Ranchi. ..... … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ..... … Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Vijoy Kumar Sinha, A.P.P. ------ 03/ 19.06.2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Nagri P.S. Case No. 19 of 2026, registered for the offence under Section 108 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate-XXIII, Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and only on the basis of suspicion, the petitioner has been implicated in this case. He next submits that only on the basis of video found in the mobile phone of the deceased, the name of the petitioner has come. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be provided to the petitioner. 4. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer and submits that from the video found in the mobile phone of the deceased, it has been revealed that the petitioner was harassing the deceased, who was the daughter of the informant. He next submits that in paras-7 and 8 of the case diary, the independent witnesses have also supported the [2026:JHHC:17860] -2- prosecution case. On these grounds, he submits that anticipatory bail may kindly be rejected. 5. Considering that from the video found in the mobile phone of the deceased, the name of this petitioner has come and further in paras-7 and 8 of the case diary, the independent witnesses have supported the prosecution case and in the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, above named. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated:-19.06.2026 Amitesh/-