Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040006962023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(C)/95/2023 The General Manager (Region) and Anr Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Food Corporation of India G.S. Road Paltan Bazar Guwahati 2: the Area Manager Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Food Corporation of India District Office Tezpur. VERSUS The Tawang Large Sized Multipurpose Co Operative Society Ltd. and 3 Ors. Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Represented by its Managing Director Shri Deba Nanda Panging S/o Shri Karneshwar Panging Resident of Tawang PO/PS Tawang District Tawang Arunachal Pradesh. 2:THE STATE OF AP Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Represented by its Secretary to the Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Food and Civil Supplies Itanagar. 3:the Director Page No.# 2/3 Age: 0 Occupation : Address:of Civil Supplies Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Naharlagun. 4:the Deputy Commissioner Age: 0 Occupation : Address:Tawang District Tawang Arunachal Pradesh ------------ Advocate for : B K Singh Advocate for : GA (AP) appearing for The Tawang Large Sized Multipurpose Co Operative Society Ltd. and 3 Ors.: Advocate , , appearing for 2, 3, 4, respectively. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 08.01.2026 Heard Mr. B. K. Singh, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Jambey Tsering Kee, learned counsel for Opposite Party No. 1 and Ms. Pubi Pangu, learned Government Advocate, for Opposite Parties No. 2, 3 & 4. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of delay of 52 days in preferring the connected review petition. The reasons for delay in not filing the connected review petition within the stipulated time, has been explained by the applicant in paragraphs No. 2 to 8 of this application. Upon hearing the learned counsels appearing for the parties and on perusal of the explanation given in the above-noted paragraphs; this Court is satisfied that the applicant was prevented by a sufficient cause in not preferring the Page No.# 3/3 connected review petition within the stipulated time. Moreover, the respondents have no objection condoning the delay, in question. In view of the above; the delay of 52 days in preferring the connected review petition is hereby condoned. The interlocutory application accordingly stands allowed and disposed of. As requested, list the connected review petition being Rev.P. 05(AP)2023 for admission after 4(four) weeks on a date to be fixed by the Registry. JUDGE Comparing Assistant